by Debra Heine
Pfizer and Moderna’s lack of transparency regarding DNA contamination in its COVID-19 shots “meets the criteria for evidence of fraud,” according to the doctor who invented the mRNA vaccine technology upon which the products are based.
“They [Pfizer and Moderna] absolutely did know about the existence of SV40 sequences,” vaccinologist Dr. Robert Malone told Republican lawmakers during a livestream House hearing Monday. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) led the event to examine injuries and deaths caused by COVID-19 vaccinations.
The panel included Malone, obstetrician Dr. Kimberly Biss and lawyer Thomas Renz, all of whom are vocal critics of the COVID shots and masking protocols.
“As a member of the COVID Select Committee, I hope this hearing today will offer a voice to those who have been injured by these vaccines or have lost loved ones to them,” Rep. Greene said Monday. “While I myself am unvaccinated, I have tremendous compassion for those who trusted the government and took the vaccine.”
Dr. Malone argued the the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should have known better than to approve the contaminated mRNA products.
“We have now learned that these products are contaminated and the current arm-wrestling is whether or not that level of contamination meets the criteria for the federal CFR [Code of Federal Regulations] statute that defines adulteration, Malone explained. “The FDA denies that they meet that criteria and yet they appear in many laboratories to have met that criteria.”
The FDA recently issued a statement on the issue: “With over a billion doses of the mRNA vaccines administered, no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified,” the FDA said. “In general, with regard to the mRNA vaccines, while concerns have been raised previously as theoretical issues, available scientific evidence supports the conclusion that the vaccines are safe and effective. The FDA stands behind its findings of quality, safety, and efficacy for the mRNA vaccines.”
Since the rollout of the COVID vaccines, disability claims and excess deaths from unknown causes have skyrocketed. But because some vaccine adverse effects can take months or even years to surface, they are generally not attributed to the jab.
Malone slammed the FDA’s lax approach, telling lawmakers that normally and historically “rigorous genotoxicity and insertional mutagenesis” tests are done to ensure the safety of the product.
“The rules are, you don’t draw a conclusion without data,” Malone said.
In molecular biology, genotoxicity is the property of chemical agents that damage the genetic information within a cell causing mutations, which may lead to cancer.
Insertional mutagenesis is the creation of mutations in DNA by the addition of one or more DNA base pairs, disrupting gene function.
“The FDA historically has drafted guidelines that pharma can choose to follow or not, but if they don’t follow them, it’s going to be harder to get the [vaccine] through,” Malone explained.
In the development of the products, plasmid DNA vectors are used for in vitro transcription in the vaccines, and are then supposed to be degraded and purified so that they no longer pose a problem. But “the process is apparently not very good,” Malone said.
“We now have the most highly effective, highly active non-viral delivery system in the history of man,” Malone said of the mRNA injections. “And we now know that that’s delivering not just RNA, but also DNA fragments.”
He added that normally, there’s supposed to be a “tension” between the pharmaceutical company and the FBA that results in a product that is safe for the public.
Internal Pfizer documents show, however, that Pfizer told the FDA that it would not do the needed rigorous genotoxicity studies and the FDA basically said, “okay, not problem.”
“So the FDA does not have the data to support this claim they’re making,” Malone said.
The doctor told the lawmakers that DNA contamination in the shots can lead to an increase birth defects and cancers in recipients, both of which are happening.
He described the FDA’s dismissal of the DNA fragments as “stonewalling.”
In its mRNA patent, Moderna even admits that the presence of DNA sequences vaccines is problematic, Malone noted.
“In that [patent], Moderna explicitly acknowledges that RNA is superior to DNA for vaccine purposes because problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis which could lead to the activation of arcA genes or integration of tumor suppressor genes,” he said, reading from the patent.
“FDA says, they’re not aware of any concerns but Moderna in its own patent lays out exactly the same concerns that exists about DNA and insertional mutagenesis and genotoxicity ,” Malone explained. In the past, the FDA has dictated that the inclusion of DNA fragments in vaccines “must be avoided,” Malone told lawmakers.
“It is technically possible that these modified mRNA molecules that are not really RNA may persist [in a body] for a long period of time, so there could be markers that could be identified,” he said.
“I can see some scenarios wherein your constituents might have genomic modification, particularly associated with the DNA fragment contamination,” he added.
The doctor accused Pfizer of committing fraud when the company submitted its test results to the FDA and other world health regulators: “They took these standard plasma maps that are generated through programs we all have access to, and they deleted the little notation that said there’s SV40 sequences in there.”
“The FDA, apparently, out of I can only think incompetence, didn’t take the raw DNA sequences, reconstruct those plasmid maps, and look at those themselves,” he said. “They just took for granted what Pfizer had given them. And now this has all come out.”
But Pfizer and Moderna knew what they were doing, Malone added.
Rep. Greene noted that if Pfizer and Moderna knew, they are technically liable for vaccine injuries of people who were told they would “lose their job if they don’t take the vaccine, they get kicked out of the military, they can’t go to college, they can’t go to school, they can’t fly airplanes, they can’t feed their families …”
Malone said the public debate right now is whether the presence of the DNA contamination levels amounts to just minor contamination or adulteration. And the pharmaceutical companies are stonewalling the data that can answer that question.
“If it’s adulteration, it crosses the Rubicon in terms of the COVID federal regulations,” the doctor said.
Greene pointed out that a lot of her colleagues get donations from Big Pharma so they’re not inclined to examine any of these issues.
“So we have a problem in Washington,” Greene said.
“In due respect to your colleagues, they’re going to have to decide whether the health and safety of the American people are more important than the paychecks they’re getting from Big Pharma and their paid lobbyists,” said Thomas Renz.
“This is one of the most egregious and outrageous things I’ve ever seen, and I don’t give the same benefit of the doubt that Dr. Malone gives. I think that this is stuff that people [regulators] are well aware of. I think they were aware all the way through,” the lawyer continued.
“There’s a revolving door between the FCA and Big Pharma. You just shut your mouth so you can get your paycheck and go work for Big Pharma when you leave. This is absolutely the reason that we had the Nuremburg Code: informed consent for running medical experimentation,” he said.
Renz pointed out that different vaccine lots had different ingredients and dosages, which is why some batches are far more deadly than others.
“They knew what they were doing! They were experimenting. This is the largest experiment on the human population in history and it was entirely done without informed consent. There’s no question what’s occurring here,” Renz exclaimed. “The only people denying it are the crooks who are implicated in it.”
– – –
Debra Heine reports for American Greatness.
